Double Standards in Geopolitics

In a thought-provoking reflection, Hamid Dabashi (a professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University) encourages readers to imagine a fictional scenario where countries like Iran, Syria, Lebanon, or Turkey, supported by Russia and China, bomb Tel Aviv for three months. The grim portrayal includes the murder of tens of thousands, countless injuries, and millions left homeless, all justified under the pretext of seeking Israeli Prime Minister and his war cabinet. Dabashi challenges readers to consider how the US, UK, EU, Canada, and Australia would respond to such a hypothetical scenario within 24 hours.

The vivid imagery painted by Dabashi prompts us to ponder the swift and resolute international reaction that would likely follow such an attack on Tel Aviv. The suggestion is that the existing world order, under the influence of powerful nations, would not tolerate such military aggression. The prompt raises questions about the consistency of global responses to conflicts and the role of major players in maintaining peace and stability.

Returning from this imaginary scenario to the stark reality, Dabashi directs attention to the plight of the Palestinian people. Since October 7 and for decades prior, Tel Aviv’s western allies, including the US, have not only witnessed but actively supported Israel’s actions against the Palestinian population. This support comes in the form of military equipment, bombs, munitions, and diplomatic cover. Furthermore, American media outlets are accused of providing ideological justifications for what the author terms as the “slaughter and genocide” of Palestinians.

Dabashi contends that the stark contrast between the hypothetical scenario and the actual situation reveals a double standard in the international community’s approach to conflicts. The military backing and diplomatic support provided to Israel by the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada are portrayed as a form of “military thuggery” that marginalizes the suffering of the Palestinians. This, according to the author, is not merely a political reality but extends to the moral and philosophical framework of what is often referred to as “the West.”

The exploration of this hypothetical scenario serves as a powerful tool to underscore the inconsistencies in global responses to conflicts. The juxtaposition of a potential international outcry against an attack on Tel Aviv with the longstanding support for Israeli actions against Palestinians challenges readers to reflect on the ethical and moral dimensions of geopolitical decisions. Hamid Dabashi’s words beckon us to critically assess the prevailing global order and the role of powerful nations in shaping the destiny of vulnerable populations caught in the crossfire of conflict.

The post Double Standards in Geopolitics first appeared on street art united states.
by Sami Wakim via street art united states

from Graffiti Bremen und Mehr ! Streetart auf Papier und Online https://ift.tt/92NfDvy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Silence of the Street Art Community is Disappointing

Image
As we are witnessing a genocide unfolding before our eyes in Gaza, hundreds of thousands of people around the world have come together to march and protest in solidarity with the Palestinians and demand a ceasefire. However, I can’t help but feel disappointment with the street art community that is, for the most part, silent, a community that “supposedly” supports underserved communities and gives a voice to the voiceless. Seasonal in Ruins by Escif The contrast between the vocal condemnation of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine by artists who advocate for peace and justice and their relative silence on the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians is indeed striking. While many artists have used their platforms to raise their voices against one form of conflict, it raises questions about the consistency of their advocacy. The situation in Palestine demands a similar commitment to the principles of justice, human rights, and empathy for those affected by violence and oppression. It underscores th
Read more

13 DEADLY SCARY GRAFFITI ARTISTS TO CONSUME BEFORE YOU DIE

Image
You don’t have long left to live on this planet, but there is plenty of time left to suffer at the hands of these artists whose dedication to torturing walls and trains knows no bounds. Whether it be through lethal lettering, killer characters or awful abstraction, these unhinged beings live amongst us, living discreet existences during the day before unleashing their evil imaginations by night.

 Extreme warning: the contents of list should only be consumed by human beings with extreme tolerance to disturbing graffiti styles. Tera There seems to be something in the water in Italy that produces artists keen on bizarre textures, organic ornamentation and fungal features. Tera works interact with the abandoned spaces she finds with discomforting results. Kool Func 88 This Frenchman gets his name from Fun Crime, and is a member of the dangerous crews GT and UB. His graffiti is 100 % twisted, evidenced by the names he gives to his pieces: “Leftover Potato”, “Weirdies” and “Corrod
Read more

OKUDA: A LIFE PAINTING FOR FREEDOM AND DIVERSITY

Image
This month at Montana Colors we’ve celebrated #mtnwokemonth: a series of publications and articles on MTN World and on social media highlighting the role of graffiti, street art, muralism and exhibitions in promoting social causes. We can think of no-one better to cap off the month than Okuda San Miguel , a world-famous Spanish artist who makes no secret of the role of his art in the promotion of freedom of collectives of all kinds. MTN World caught up with him during the production of a huge new collaboration in Valencia with Sixe Paredes to talk about social causes in art, the effect of travelling on the environment and his support for the LGBTQI+ community. Are there any artists that you think have an interesting social message? I love Icy and Sot , I think their work is incredible. Besides, I know their backstory: they escaped from Iran because they were going to be imprisoned just for their art, and they have political asylum in the United States. What they communicate in t
Read more